Open Stack

Excerpts from ChangBo Guo's message of 2017-02-09 15:21:55 +0800:
> I just added it in https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/community-goals
> yesterday. submit a community goal for this ?

Someone needs to start documenting the sort of work needed (how many
projects use mox3, and how much) and putting together a porting guide
with suggestions for converting between the two styles of tests. And we
should document the conversion of one project so we can use it as an
example for others. When we have done those things, we will understand
the scope well enough to know if it's a reasonable goal or if it needs
to be handled as a longer term initiative.

Doug

> 
> 2017-02-09 3:20 GMT+08:00 Doug Hellmann <doug at doughellmann.com>:
> 
> > Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2017-02-08 10:01:27 -0800:
> > > Doug Hellmann wrote:
> > > > Excerpts from ChangBo Guo's message of 2017-02-08 10:41:04 +0800:
> > > >> Thanks Doug and amoralej,  we should avoid this :(．
> > > >>
> > > >> One more thought about mox3: Is it used outside of OpenStack? If yes,
> > > >> Maybe we can retire mox3 if all projects move mox to mock.
> > > >
> > > > I thought our policy was that mox3 was already deprecated and all new
> > > > tests should use mock instead. Converting the existing tests can be
> > > > non-trivial because of the differences in how the two libraries work,
> > > > but it would help us move off of mox3.
> > >
> > > Sounds like one of those community goals (like move off oslo-incubator)
> > > to me :)
> >
> > It could be, sure. We need a volunteer to organize it.
> >
> > Doug
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Doug
> > > >
> > > >> 2017-02-07 23:00 GMT+08:00 Doug Hellmann<doug at doughellmann.com>:
> > > >>
> > > >>> The stable/ocata branch for mox3 was created from 0.19.0 and then
> > 0.20.0
> > > >>> was released from master. Because that repository sees a very low
> > rate
> > > >>> of changes, and because the current stable/ocata branch only
> > contained
> > > >>> the patch to update the .gitreview file, we decided to recreate the
> > > >>> branch to accurately reflect the intent of having 0.20.0 be part of
> > the
> > > >>> ocata series of releases.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> https://review.openstack.org/430283
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thanks go to amoralej for pointing out the issue today.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Doug
> > > >>>
> > > >>> ____________________________________________________________
> > ______________
> > > >>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > > >>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:
> > unsubscribe
> > > >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> > > >>>
> > > >
> > > > ____________________________________________________________
> > ______________
> > > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > > > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:
> > unsubscribe
> > > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> > >
> >
> > __________________________________________________________________________
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
>