[openstack-dev] [ironic][qa][grenade] Release blocked on grenade job not testing from newton

Jim Rollenhagen jim at jimrollenhagen.com
Thu Feb 9 13:22:38 UTC 2017


On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 7:51 AM, Sean Dague <sean at dague.net> wrote:

> On 02/09/2017 07:00 AM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote:
> > Hey folks,
> >
> > Ironic plans to release Ocata this week, once we have a couple small
> patches
> > and a release note cleanup landed.
> >
> > However, our grenade job is now testing master->master, best I can tell.
> > This
> > is pretty clearly due to this d-s-g commit:
> > https://github.com/openstack-infra/devstack-gate/commit/
> 9c752b02fbd57c7021a7c9295bf4d68a0d1973a8
> >
> > Evidence:
> >
> > * it appears to be checking out a change on master into the old side:
> >
> > http://logs.openstack.org/44/354744/10/check/gate-grenade-
> dsvm-ironic-ubuntu-xenial/4b395ff/logs/grenade.sh.txt.
> gz#_2017-02-09_07_15_32_979
> >
> > * and somewhat coincidentally, our grenade job seems to be broken when
> > master
> >   (ocata) is on the old side, because we now select instance images in
> our
> >   devstack plugin:
> >
> > http://logs.openstack.org/44/354744/10/check/gate-grenade-
> dsvm-ironic-ubuntu-xenial/4b395ff/logs/grenade.sh.txt.
> gz#_2017-02-09_08_07_10_946
> >
> > So, we're currently blocking the ironic release on this, as obviously we
> > don't
> > want to release if we don't know upgrades work. As I see it, we have two
> > options:
> >
> > 1) Somehow fix devstack-gate and configure our jobs in project-config
> > such that
> > this job upgrades newton->master. I might need some help on navigating
> this
> > one.
> >
> > 2) Make our grenade job non-voting for now, release 7.0.0 anyway, and
> > immediately make sure that the stable/ocata branch runs grenade as
> > expected and
> > passes. If it isn't passing, fix what we need to and cut 7.0.1 ASAP.
> >
> > Thoughts?
>
> By now ironic should have a stable/ocata branch, right? That's the thing
> that is missing -
> https://github.com/openstack-infra/devstack-gate/commit/
> 9c752b02fbd57c7021a7c9295bf4d68a0d1973a8
>
> A stable/ocata branch doesn't require a release. It's an expectation
> that all the projects have one of those at this point.
>
> I'd be -1 putting project specific branch selection logic inside
> devstack-gate. Things are already complicated enough there.
>

Ironic's release model is cycle-with-intermediary, meaning we don't do
release
candidates, and don't necessarily branch at the same time. The deadline is
next
week; we were hoping to get ahead of the game this week.

And a branch does require a release as a branch point (though in most cases
that's
an RC1 release), if the project is released at all, AIUI.

// jim
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20170209/21c562bf/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list