Open Stack

On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 11:39:16AM -0700, Alex Schultz wrote:

> Perhaps we can start reviewing the items and those with little to no
> impact we can merge for the remainder of the cycle. I know
> realistically everything has an impact so it'll be >0, but lets try
> and keep it as close to 0 as possible.  I know we've already merged
> some arch support stuff this cycle but it does seem doubtful that
> it'll be properly fully supported in TripleO by the end of Queens. I
> think it best to leave the blueprint slated for Rocky-1 unless we get
> some sudden movement on patches.  Please continue to propose patches
> for review and let's make sure they work in a backwards compatible
> fashion with extra eyes on upgrade impacts.

Okay.  We'll do our best and see where we get to.

In the meantime I'll start a related, but seperate thread to talk
through the design issues for the multi-arcgh images and containers to
try and focus development when we get there ;P

Yours Tony.