2017-12-04 19:36 GMT+08:00 Duncan Thomas <duncan.thomas at gmail.com>: > Why remove something that works and people are using? Yes, removing it will make noise. > > If polster can be set up to do the job, then great, but there's no > rush to remove the existing infrastructure; this is one case where > duplication is very, very cheap. Yes it is too cheap to refuse. But i think it should be not exists there. > > On 4 December 2017 at 10:30, Jaze Lee <jazeltq at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Right now,we can get volume from central pollester. Then i think >> may be we can drop cinder volume usage. >> Cinder volume usage, do not like nova usage which is in nova >> compute. It is a cmd. And should put it in cron. This will cause more >> work in devops. If ceilometer >> pollester can handle it. I think may be we should remove it? >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> 谦谦君子 >> >> __________________________________________________________________________ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > -- > Duncan Thomas > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- 谦谦君子