Open Stack

Thanks for your feedback, all!
It seems we have a consensus and the route is "(a) dashboard
repository per project".
I would suggest xxxx-dashboard as a repository name where xxxx is your
main repo name.


2017-04-11 0:09 GMT+09:00 Akihiro Motoki <amotoki at gmail.com>:
> Hi neutrinos (and horizoners),
>
> As the title says, where would we like to have horizon dashboard for
> neutron stadium projects?
> There are several projects under neutron stadium and they are trying
> to add dashboard support.
>
> I would like to raise this topic again. No dashboard support lands since then.
> Also Horizon team would like to move in-tree neutron stadium dashboard
> (VPNaaS and FWaaS v1 dashboard) to outside of horizon repo.
>
> Possible approaches
> ----------------------------
>
> Several possible options in my mind:
> (a) dashboard repository per project
> (b) dashboard code in individual project
> (c) a single dashboard repository for all neutron stadium projects
>
> Which one sounds better?
>
> Pros and Cons
> --------------------
>
> (a) dashboard repository per project
>   example, networking-sfc-dashboard repository for networking-sfc
>   Pros
>    - Can use existing horizon related project convention and knowledge
>      (directory structure, testing, translation support)
>    - Not related to the neutron stadium inclusion. Each project can
> provide its dashboard
>      support regardless of neutron stadium inclusion.
>  Cons
>    - An additional repository is needed.
>
> (b) dashboard code in individual project
>   example, dashboard module for networking-sfc
>   Pros:
>    - No additional repository
>    - Not related to the neutron stadium inclusion. Each project can
> provide its dashboard
>      support regardless of neutron stadium inclusion.
>  Cons:
>    - Requires extra efforts to support neutron and horizon codes in a
> single repository
>      for testing and translation supports. Each project needs to
> explore the way.
>
> (c) a single dashboard repository for all neutron stadium projects
>    (something like neutron-advanced-dashboard)
>   Pros:
>     - No additional repository per project
>       Each project do not need a basic setup for dashboard and
> possible makes things simple.
>   Cons:
>     - Inclusion criteria depending on the neutron stadium inclusion/exclusion
>       (Similar discussion happens as for neutronclient OSC plugin)
>       Project before neutron stadium inclusion may need another implementation.
>
>
> My vote is (a) or (c) (to avoid mixing neutron and dashboard codes in a repo).
>
> Note that as dashboard supports for feature in the main neutron repository
> are implemented in the horizon repository as we discussed several months ago.
> As an example, trunk support is being development in the horizon repo.
>
> Thanks,
> Akihiro