For those looking for a little background information on RBAC, I've included a link to the NIST RBAC model [0]. It doesn't drill down to the nitty-gritty implementation details, but it does give a good idea of RBAC standardization complete with examples. If anyone has any additional references they've found useful for RBAC discussions, feel free to drop them here. [0] http://csrc.nist.gov/rbac/sandhu-ferraiolo-kuhn-00.pdf On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Lance Bragstad <lbragstad at gmail.com> wrote: > We ended up cancelling today's policy meeting, but policy discussions > carried on throughout the day in #openstack-keystone [0]. We have several > specs up for review [1][2][3][4]. Some are nova specs and a couple are > proposed to keystone. With keystone's spec proposal freeze coming up next > week [5], this is our last shot to collaborate on new ideas if we want to > propose any for Pike. > > I'm sending out this note to ask folks interested in the policy > discussions to have a look at the proposed specs. Next week's meeting will > be focused on having detailed discussions about them. > > If you just can't wait to start talking about policy until next week, come > find me in #openstack-dev. Pre-discussions might help maximize our meeting > next week. > > Thanks! > > [0] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-keystone/% > 23openstack-keystone.2017-04-05.log.html#t2017-04-05T16:24:29 > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/427872/ > [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/433037/ > [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/452198/ > [4] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/453739/ > [5] https://releases.openstack.org/pike/schedule. > html#p-keystone-spec-proposal-freeze > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20170406/02fa81fc/attachment.html>