Open Stack

On 04/04/2017 09:19 AM, Jay S Bryant wrote:
> Monty,
>
> I agree with your approach.  Think we should not break other projects
> with a change like this and the answer thus far has been to just patch
> each project individually to work around the issues introduced by
> eventlet.  So, I support this approach and think Sean would as well.

To follow up with everyone - dims and I spent a bit of time this morning 
testing combinations of things, and it seems that master of eventlet 
actually also does not fix things - there are some issues that will just 
need to be figured out.

The suggested path forward at the moment is to pull designate out of the 
requirements-sync process so it can stay pinned at 0.19 while the issues 
are sorted out. A patch to bump designate back to 0.20.1 can accompany 
the patch to fix it for 0.20.1 - and can be done as people have time, 
rather than in a rush.

> On 4/4/2017 8:33 AM, Monty Taylor wrote:
>> Hey all,
>>
>> We recently increased the version of eventlet we're using. The bump
>> was driven by python3.5 enablement for oslo.messaging, which is a
>> great thing to have exist. However, it has hard-broken designate - and
>> not just the docs builds like happened for other projects.
>>
>> There is a patch that has landed to upstream eventlet that will fix
>> the designate issues, but it is not yet released.
>>
>> I'd like to propose we revert the U-C bump and block 0.20 in our
>> requirements. This hamstrings the 3.5 enablement a bit, but it
>> unbreaks designate, and I'd argue that we need to prioritize not
>> breaking services in cases like this. (also, because designate is
>> broken, openstack-ansible has gate issues, and shade had gate issues
>> until we removed designate from our gate config which was extremely
>> sad making)
>>
>> Sean McGinnis already proposed a patch to revert the bump:
>>
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/448104/
>>
>> which I think we should restore, then modify it to also include a
>> requirements block. As soon as 0.21 is released, we can upgrade to
>> that and get 3.5 for oslo.messaging back on track.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Monty
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev