Tagging kolla On 29/09/16 16:22, Michał Jastrzębski wrote: > Agree with Christian, this is our internal wiring. As long as we > provide automated upgrade procedure which will seamlessly migrate from > heka to alternative we want, we should be good without deprecation per > se. > > Cheers, > Michal > > On 29 September 2016 at 04:36, Christian Berendt > <berendt at betacloud-solutions.de> wrote: >>> On 29 Sep 2016, at 06:26, Steven Dake (stdake) <stdake at cisco.com> wrote: >>> >>> If you have a different parsing of the deprecation policy, feel free to chime in. >> >> Heka is only used as an internal component of Kolla and is not provided as a service for the operators. It should be sufficient to replace Heka by something else without deprecating it. >> >> Christian. >> >> __________________________________________________________________________ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >