Open Stack

2016-09-26 16:05 GMT+02:00 Anita Kuno <anteaya at anteaya.info>:
> On 16-09-26 07:48 AM, Haïkel wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> following our discussions about 3rd party gates in RPM packaging project,
>> I suggest that we vote in order to promote the following gates as voting:
>> - MOS CI
>> - SUSE CI
>>
>> After promotion, all patchsets submitted will have to validate these gates
>> in order to get merged. And gates maintainers should ensure that the gates
>> are running properly.
>>
>> Please vote before (and/or during) our thursday meeting.
>>
>>
>> +1 to promote both MOS and SUSE CI as voting gates.
>>
>> Regards,
>> H.
>
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by voting gates. Gates don't vote, an individual
> job can leave a verified +1 in the check queue or/and a verified +2 in the
> gate queue.
>
> Third party CI systems do not vote verified +2 in gerrit. They may if the
> project chooses vote verified +1 on a project.
>

Yeah, that was pretty much what was assumed.
Gates that do not leave verified +1 are called non-voting, so
logically gates that leaves verified +1 are called voting gates.

> If you need clarification in what third party ci systems may do in gerrit,
> you are welcome to reply to this email, join the #openstack-infra channel or
> participate in a third party meeting:
> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Third_Party_Meeting
>
> Thank you,
> Anita.
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev