Open Stack

On 9/20/2016 7:38 AM, Alan Pevec wrote:
> 2016-09-20 13:27 GMT+02:00 Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart at redhat.com>:
>>>   (3) Do nothing, leave the bug unfixed in stable/liberty
>>
>> That was the unspoken third option, thanks for spelling it out. :-)
>
> Yes, let's abandon both reviews.
>
> Cheers,
> Alan
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>

I'd rather not bump the minimum on oslo.concurrency given the transitive 
dependencies that would be pulled in which required higher minimums.

So if I had to choose I'd go with the nova backport with the workaround:

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/327624/

Which logs an error if you don't have a new enough oslo.concurrency.

But I'm also fine with just considering this a latent bug as danpb 
pointed out and let downstream packagers/vendors handle it as they see fit.

-- 

Thanks,

Matt Riedemann