Open Stack

Tony Breeds wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 12:10:53PM +0000, Tristan Cacqueray wrote:
> 
>> Lastly, election officials are also reachable through the
>> #openstack-election Freenode channel.
> 
> I wonder if it's worth having all conversations in #openstack-dev?
> 
> There are pros and cons to both.
> 
> Having a single purpose election channel certainly make it easy to spot election activity
> Using openstack-dev increases the possibility of braoder reach.
> 
> I don't have a strong opionion either way.

At the very least it should happen in a logged channel.

I think reusing #openstack-dev for this is fine -- it's an activity that
is limited in time (so doesn't need a permanent channel) and -dev is
pretty inactive those days.

-- 
Thierry Carrez (ttx)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160913/50881d2b/attachment.pgp>