On 09/08/2016 01:27 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > What's up in upgrades? > > 1) Undercloud: Mitaka to Newton > > We just approved a patch in openstack-infra/tripleo-ci that test > undercloud upgrades. > I don't think we should make it vote as for now it's quite > experimental. Though I'm wondering if we should move it to the check > pipeline as non-voting (currently in experimental queue). > > This is a first iteration and if you plan to upgrade your undercloud, > you'll still have to do manual steps that we do in tripleo-ci. They > are described here: > https://github.com/openstack-infra/tripleo-ci/blob/41e8560cf3d313f2be69df64e4c95a3240dfa402/scripts/tripleo.sh#L554-L577 > > We need to decide where to put these bits: in tripleoclient? in > instack-undercloud? Let's talk about it. I think we already did: https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/tripleo-specs/specs/newton/undercloud-upgrade.html There are details about where various bits of the implementation should live because it turns out that is pretty fundamental to the design of the upgrade process. > > > 2) Overcloud: Mitaka to Newton > > matbu and myself are working together on a CI job that will test the > upgrade of an undercloud + overcloud from Mitaka to Newton. > Work is here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/364859 and > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/323750/ (both patches are going to > merge together so we have one single patch for review). > The idea is to use multinode job for now as a first iteration, with > the simplest scenario possible so we can easily iterate later. > > > 3) Overcloud: Newton to Newton > I'm working on a simple patch that would test updates from Newton to > Newton: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/351330/ like we had with OVB > jobs but this time using multinode. > > > Any feedback, help, is highly welcome. >