Open Stack

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 08:34:12AM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 08:42:48AM +0200, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> 
> > I think it would also make sense to *release* on the boundary of the switch;
> > so that it’s clear which phase a release followed.
> 
> I agree, I don't really have a mechanism for do that though.  I didn't state
> this but my plan was to reach out the PTLs that have the stable:follows-policy
> tag and ask them to release.  I suppose I could go one step further and
> propose the change in openstack/releases but that seems a little like over
> reach to me.
> 
> What do PTLs / stable CPLs think?

That makes sense to me. I tried to do that for the last go around as a
final official release for the stable branch.

> 
> BTW: I see you've done this for neutron :)   Thanks!
> 
> Yours Tony.



> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev