Open Stack

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 08:42:48AM +0200, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:

> I think it would also make sense to *release* on the boundary of the switch;
> so that it’s clear which phase a release followed.

I agree, I don't really have a mechanism for do that though.  I didn't state
this but my plan was to reach out the PTLs that have the stable:follows-policy
tag and ask them to release.  I suppose I could go one step further and
propose the change in openstack/releases but that seems a little like over
reach to me.

What do PTLs / stable CPLs think?

BTW: I see you've done this for neutron :)   Thanks!

Yours Tony.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20161011/da7af50b/attachment.pgp>