Open Stack

Thanks for the additional notes, Thierry!

On 10/6/16, 12:53 AM, "Thierry Carrez" <thierry at openstack.org> wrote:

>Good summary. It is true that for small-to-medium sized teams (which did
>not routinely organize midcycles), there is a tough choice to make.
>
>See a couple of remarks inline:
>
>Eric K wrote:
>> Here are some of our choices as a team, as well as some first thoughts
>>on
>> pros and cons:
>> 
>> 1. Do work sessions at PTGs; no organized work sessions at summits.
>> Pro: schedule lines up wit beginning of dev cycle
>> Pro: work room available
>> Pro: easy to collaborate with other teams
>> Con: extra travel for those who will continue to attend summit.
>
>+Pro: PTGs are organized in cheaper locations and closer to the center
>of mass of contributors, hopefully making it less costly to travel to
>overall
>+Pro: More team time (for Congress: 2-3 days instead 2-3 hours) for a
>better return on travel investment
>
>> 2. Unofficial work session at summits; no work sessions at PTGs.
>> Pro: For people who would be going to the summits anyway, this option
>> reduces travel.
>> Con: probably no official work room available.
>> Con: happens at the middle of a dev cycle
>> 
>> 3. Separately organize work sessions in the style of past mid-cycle
>> sprints; no work sessions at any of the official openstack events.
>> Pro: we can choose schedule and location
>> Con: harder to collaborate with other teams
>
>+Con: extra travel for those who will continue to attend summit
>
>-- 
>Thierry Carrez (ttx)
>
>__________________________________________________________________________
>OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev