Le 06/10/2016 15:41, Chris Dent a écrit : > On Wed, 5 Oct 2016, Matt Riedemann wrote: > >> The draft design summit schedule for nova is here: >> >> https://www.openstack.org/summit/barcelona-2016/summit-schedule/global-search?t=Nova%3A >> > > [snip] > >> If there are any questions or issues with this please speak up >> because this will more or less be official next week. > > Is there a particular reason we're only retrospecting on placement? > Based on the etherpad[1] and conversations with other contributors a > lot of the questions and concerns about how things went with > placement are applicable to much of the rest of Nova; and, despite my > (well intentioned) moaning, I've been told that the experience on > placement (as a priority) was above average so it may not be > representative. > > I suspect we can map many of the ideas and experiences from a > retrospective devoted to placement to more general concerns but I'd > hate for people who had no involvement in it but are concerned about > Nova to feel excluded. > The real problem I see with that is given all the bullets, it would take far more than just 40 mins just to be at least discussing about. That doesn't mean we shouldn't talk about the other mentioned points, just not by the time Matt proposed the session IMHO. -Sylvain > [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-newton-retrospective > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20161006/9467de3c/attachment.html>