On 3 Oct 2016, at 12:31, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > I think that's the balance we want to > have: listen to input, collect information, then clearly set the > direction without over-prescribing the implementation. In light of this statement, would you reevaluate previous decisions you've made regarding implementation details? You've criticized OpenStack projects for not using certain code, you've advocated for openstack-wide goals which are all about implementation[1], and you voted against Swift and other projects using Golang for an internal process[2]. Each of these are quite prescriptive with regards to the implementation. Would you change your vote on any of these decisions if you are reelected? [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/349068/ [2] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2016/tc.2016-08-02-20.01.log.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 801 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20161003/004db4a6/attachment.pgp>