Ready for review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/404517/ On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 5:50 PM Weyl, Alexey (Nokia - IL) < alexey.weyl at nokia.com> wrote: > Sounds good to me J > > > > *From:* Yujun Zhang [mailto:zhangyujun+zte at gmail.com] > *Sent:* Monday, November 28, 2016 10:43 AM > *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > *Subject:* [ALU] [openstack-dev] [vitrage] common vs utils > > > > Currently, we have `common/utils.py`, `common/file_utils.py` and an empty > module `utils` in `vitrage`. > > > > In my understanding, `common` means *common to vitrage package* and utils > are more *general purpose utility* functions. > > > > Would it better that we move `utils.py`, `file_utils.py` and > `datetime_utils.py` to `utils`? > > > > -- > > Yujun > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20161130/696768f3/attachment.html>