Open Stack

I don't really like logstash as it's big memory eating beast. We had
good arch without it, and I'd like to keep it this way. Even with
logstash we still would need to use rsyslog to push logs around to
logstash, and that's a pita (trust me, I wrote it.).

Fluentd just became cncf-backed project so that's a plus for fluentd.
Out of fliebeat+logstash vs flutentd I'd go with fluentd.

On 28 November 2016 at 03:15, Christian Berendt
<berendt at betacloud-solutions.de> wrote:
>
>> On 27 Nov 2016, at 06:55, Jeffrey Zhang <zhang.lei.fly at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> * Fluentd
>> * Logstash
>
> I do not have a strong behaviour.
>
> At the moment we use the E and K of the ELK stack. Because of that I think it makes sense to go with Logstash. In this way, we have a stack developed by one community and which is tuned to each other.
>
> Christian.
>
> --
> Christian Berendt
> Chief Executive Officer (CEO)
>
> Mail: berendt at betacloud-solutions.de
> Web: https://www.betacloud-solutions.de
>
> Betacloud Solutions GmbH
> Teckstrasse 62 / 70190 Stuttgart / Deutschland
>
> Geschäftsführer: Christian Berendt
> Unternehmenssitz: Stuttgart
> Amtsgericht: Stuttgart, HRB 756139
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev