[openstack-dev] [ALU] [vitrage] common vs utils

Weyl, Alexey (Nokia - IL) alexey.weyl at nokia.com
Mon Nov 28 09:46:20 UTC 2016

Sounds good to me ☺

From: Yujun Zhang [mailto:zhangyujun+zte at gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 10:43 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [ALU] [openstack-dev] [vitrage] common vs utils

Currently, we have `common/utils.py`, `common/file_utils.py` and an empty module `utils` in `vitrage`.

In my understanding, `common` means common to vitrage package and utils are more general purpose utility functions.

Would it better that we move `utils.py`, `file_utils.py` and `datetime_utils.py` to `utils`?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20161128/0aacff11/attachment.html>

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list