[openstack-dev] [neutron] stable/newton 'broken'
reedip banerjee
reedip14 at gmail.com
Fri Nov 25 04:56:13 UTC 2016
I agree to tap-as-a-service being tech-preview for this release to get over
this issue , if it is still relevant.
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:39 AM, Armando M. <armamig at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 24 November 2016 at 11:12, Gary Kotton <gkotton at vmware.com> wrote:
>
>> The breakage is due to the fact that the projects do not have
>> stable/newton branches cut.
>>
> This is something that I would have expected the neutron team to take care
>> of as long as it was under the stadium/tent or whatever we want to call it.
>>
>
> Before [1] and [2] you were pulling from master all the time. You are in
> charge of your own project, so you are solely at fault of the issue you're
> complaining about.
>
> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/400462/
> [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/402070/
>
>
>> The fact that the l2gw was removed may have been an indication that it
>> should not have been there. But we have a clear responsibility to the
>> community about this. Was there are mail indicating that it is excluded
>> from the stadium/tent. I do not recall. I just woke up one morning
>> discovering that you did that. There was not much discussion there.
>>
>
> LOL, you genuinely made me laugh. If you don't stay plugged, whose fault
> is that again? The discussion for the governance update did not happen
> overnight.
>
>
>>
> It is really unclear how the patches that you added below would have
>> solved the problem.
>>
>> We have made sure that the vmware-nsx code is back up and running. I just
>> hope that others are unaffected by this.
>>
>
> My patch specifically would have not solved the problem you claim it's
> caused by the recent neutron master changes. I am just highlighting that
> prior to that you were always pulling from master. With my change you could
> simply set BRANCH=stable/newton in [3] in the appropriate branch and you'd
> be good to go.
>
> [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/400462/1/tools/tox_install_
> project.sh at 22
>
> What I would like to see happen:
>>
>> 1. L2gw gets a stable branch. At the moment the l2gw release team
>> is non existent so community please advise how we can add cores
>>
> You can get hold of people [1] and ask them to make you join the team.
>
> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/532,members
>
>> 2. Tap-as-a-service is added to the stadium and tent.
>>
> How is this relevant to this discussion?
>
>
>>
>> A luta continua
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *"Armando M." <armamig at gmail.com>
>> *Reply-To: *OpenStack List <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> *Date: *Thursday, November 24, 2016 at 7:03 PM
>> *To: *OpenStack List <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> *Subject: *Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] stable/newton 'broken'
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 24 November 2016 at 02:38, Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Gary Kotton wrote:
>> > Please see - http://logs.openstack.org/82/4
>> 01882/1/check/gate-vmware-nsx-python27-db-ubuntu-xenial/1ac0
>> 686/console.html#_2016-11-24_06_58_38_520273
>> > Here we are pulling trunk as there is no stable version to use
>>
>> Is neutron stable/newton really broken (like your subject seems to
>> indicate) ? Or only vmware-nsx stable/newton ? Since networking-l2gw and
>> tap-as-a-service are unofficial projects we can't guarantee that they
>> will create branches that match the official stable ones, so we should
>> try to avoid depending on them if possible...
>>
>>
>>
>> This happens because the referenced projects have no newton branch and
>> the consuming project's stable newton was pulling from the master branch
>> (and [1] is the hack referenced below). The right fix would be to backport
>> [2], create the stable branches of the projects to which vmware-nsx depends
>> on and set the branch appropriately. This is what the neutron team does for
>> the projects we look after.
>>
>>
>>
>> This breakage was waiting to happen, and it just did.
>>
>>
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/openstack/vmware-nsx/commit/9a455781e
>> 4db9fc360c3264b72c381c91dfa6a15
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_openstack_vmware-2Dnsx_commit_9a455781e4db9fc360c3264b72c381c91dfa6a15&d=DgMFaQ&c=uilaK90D4TOVoH58JNXRgQ&r=PMrZQUSXojEgJQPh7cZrz1Lvja0OwAstg0U82FalZrw&m=9RMdQBJlmqlbq0DHIHP9NTT4ot9qb0nfNG5qMMfoE2o&s=v8Iagz-K729O8YOVJ-6w_1lXYa6UNXJt65nAnaHPBns&e=>
>>
>> [2] https://github.com/openstack/vmware-nsx/commit/a951f5f92
>> 99ffdce268c54dc427a71706b8e41da
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_openstack_vmware-2Dnsx_commit_a951f5f9299ffdce268c54dc427a71706b8e41da&d=DgMFaQ&c=uilaK90D4TOVoH58JNXRgQ&r=PMrZQUSXojEgJQPh7cZrz1Lvja0OwAstg0U82FalZrw&m=9RMdQBJlmqlbq0DHIHP9NTT4ot9qb0nfNG5qMMfoE2o&s=IjsdHWFgL__ygsTjKpo2YJsfuaX6AIuy4Jn82vkfZQg&e=>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thierry Carrez (ttx)
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> ______________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscrib
>> e
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> ______________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscrib
>> e
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
--
Thanks and Regards,
Reedip Banerjee
IRC: reedip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20161125/437cc9f1/attachment.html>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list