Open Stack

Hi Ilya, 

Thanks for your answer, let me know your findings.
In any case I'll be glad to help if needed.

Matt

ps : I just realized that I missed a proper subjet to the thread :(.
If this thread continue it's maybe better to change that.

----- Mail original -----
> De: "Ilya Shakhat" <ishakhat at mirantis.com>
> À: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Envoyé: Jeudi 24 Novembre 2016 13:03:33
> Objet: Re: [openstack-dev] [Performance][shaker]
> 
> Hi Matt,
> 
> Out of the box Shaker doesn't support such topology.
> It shouldn't be hard to implement though. Let me check what needs to be
> done.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ilya
> 
> 2016-11-24 13:49 GMT+03:00 Matthieu Simonin <matthieu.simonin at inria.fr>:
> 
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm looking to shaker capabilities and I'm wondering if this kind
> > of accomodation (see attachment also) can be achieved
> >
> > Ascii (flat) version :
> >
> > CN1 (2n VMs) <- n flows -> CN2 (2n VMs)
> > CN1 (2n VMs) <- n flows -> CN3 (2n VMs)
> > CN2 (2n VMs) <- n flows -> CN3 (2n VMs)
> >
> > In this situation concurrency could be mapped to the number of
> > simultaneous flows in use per link.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Matt
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________________________________
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
> >
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>