No prob! Just needed a hint preferably before we'd merge the new API endpoint spec for the inspector [1] Cheers, milan [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/375045/10/specs/list-introspection-statuses.rst pá 18. 11. 2016 v 11:26 odesílatel Chris Dent <cdent+os at anticdent.org> napsal: > On Fri, 18 Nov 2016, milanisko k wrote: > > > Sorry Ed, > > was a bank holiday in here yesterday. > > Did the API WG conclude on a preferred operator name? > > After bouncing it around a few times 'nin' seemed to fit better and > Ed proposed a guideline: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/399131/ > > Thanks _very_ much for getting this started. > > -- > Chris Dent ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ https://anticdent.org/ > freenode: cdent tw: > @anticdent__________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20161118/889ad440/attachment.html>