On Fri, 18 Nov 2016, milanisko k wrote:
> Sorry Ed,
> was a bank holiday in here yesterday.
> Did the API WG conclude on a preferred operator name?
After bouncing it around a few times 'nin' seemed to fit better and
Ed proposed a guideline:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/399131/
Thanks _very_ much for getting this started.
--
Chris Dent ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ https://anticdent.org/
freenode: cdent tw: @anticdent