Open Stack

On Nov 14, 2016, at 2:52 PM, Ian Cordasco <sigmavirus24 at gmail.com> wrote:

> not_in is nice and explicit while nin and out are a bit, more clever. I think we should avoid trying to be clever.

Since we already had ‘new’, I thought that ‘nin’ would be consistent. No other reason to prefer it, though.

> That said, what about something like
> 
>     state=!in:x,y,z
> 
> This just makes me nervous that we're beginning to define our own query language.

Ugh - let’s not do that!


-- Ed Leafe