Open Stack

On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Jeremy Stanley <fungi at yuggoth.org> wrote:
> On 2016-11-04 15:42:17 +0000 (+0000), Paul Bourke wrote:
>> We have no desire to do this, that's not what is being discussed
>> here. On the contrary we're looking to reduce the barrier to entry
>> for committers. Also the team is aware that cross project efforts
>> should not be nit picked.
>
> That's what it seemed like to me up to this point in the thread as
> well; I was specifically replying to Swapnil's suggestion that any
> important change to Kolla deliverables should have a bug filed or
> should continue to add a TrivialFix header in the commit message
> otherwise. (And yes, as Andreas pointed out the other thread on the
> related topic of mass changes for cross-project efforts does address
> the case specifically, but becomes less necessary if you end up
> agreeing to drop the TrivialFix requirement.)
> --
> Jeremy Stanley
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Jeremy,

I am sorry if I have miscommunicated earlier. I am referring to the
situation where people are using TrivialFix just to get the changes in
which is not good practice.

I agree with removing TrivialFix just that we need to be very careful
with changes that need tracking (e.g. bug/bp).