Open Stack

+1


2016-11-04 13:32 GMT+00:00 Jeffrey Zhang <zhang.lei.fly at gmail.com>:

> +1
>
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 8:51 PM, Ryan Hallisey <rhallise at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> -Ryan
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Swapnil Kulkarni" <coolsvap at gmail.com>
>> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
>> openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> Sent: Friday, November 4, 2016 8:48:49 AM
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Propose removal of TrivialFix
>> requirement
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Paul Bourke <paul.bourke at oracle.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Kolleagues,
>> >
>> > How do people feel above removing the requirement of having TrivialFix
>> in
>> > commit messages where a bug/bp is not required?
>> >
>> > I'm seeing a lot of valid and important commits being held up because of
>> > this, in my opinion, unnecessary requirement. It also causes friction
>> for
>> > new contributers to the project.
>> >
>> > Are there any major benefits we're getting from the use of this tag
>> that I'm
>> > missing?
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > -Paul
>> >
>> > ____________________________________________________________
>> ______________
>> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.op
>> enstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>> I feel TrivialFix is consistently used by people just to avoid going
>> to lanuchpad and filing a bug. It should only be used only if the "Fix
>> is Trivial"
>> This has been well documented in the contributing doc [1] and this
>> should be referred to people when they do not have the bug/bp in the
>> commit message.
>>
>> If the commits are important then there is no harm in creating a
>> tracking bug for it.
>> It would take 1/30(I am just making highest time for a build/deploy
>> gate) amount of time you need to verify the (important)fix on gate.
>>
>> [1] docs.openstack.org/developer/kolla/CONTRIBUTING.html
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> ______________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscrib
>> e
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> ______________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscrib
>> e
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Jeffrey Zhang
> Blog: http://xcodest.me
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20161104/645acc2c/attachment.html>