[openstack-dev] [puppet] proposal about puppet versions testing coverage
Denis Egorenko
degorenko at mirantis.com
Thu May 26 10:34:22 UTC 2016
>
> * Reduce puppet versions testing to 3.6, 3.8, 4.5 and latest (keep the
> last one non-voting). It seems that 3.6 and 3.8 are widely used by our
> consumers (default in centos7 & ubuntu LTS), and 4.5 is the latest
> release in the 4.x series.
+1 from me too
* Move functional puppet4 jobs from experimental to check pipeline
> (non-voting). They'll bring very useful feedback. It will add 6 more
> jobs in the check queue, but since we will drop 2 unit tests jobs (in
> both check & gate pipelines), it will add 2 jobs at total (in term of
> time, unit tests jobs take 15 min and functional jobs take ~30 min) so
> the impact of node consumption is IMHO not relevant here.
it's a good start for using puppet4. For first time i agree, that should be
non-voting.
I think our puppet team can also start work fpr making our modules be
compatible
with puppet4. Thank you for bringing up this!
2016-05-25 22:40 GMT+03:00 Matt Fischer <matt at mattfischer.com>:
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Emilien Macchi <emilien at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Greating folks,
>>
>> In a recent poll [1], we asked to our community to tell which version
>> of Puppet they were running.
>> The motivation is to make sure our Puppet OpenStack CI test the right
>> things, that are really useful.
>>
>> Right now, we run unit test jobs on puppet on 3.3, 3.4, 3.6, 3.8, 4.0
>> and latest (current is 4.5).
>> We also have functional jobs (non-voting, in periodic pipeline), that
>> run puppet 4.5. Those ones break very often because nobody (except
>> me?) regularly checks puppet4 periodic jobs.
>>
>> So here's my proposal, feel fee to comment:
>>
>> * Reduce puppet versions testing to 3.6, 3.8, 4.5 and latest (keep the
>> last one non-voting). It seems that 3.6 and 3.8 are widely used by our
>> consumers (default in centos7 & ubuntu LTS), and 4.5 is the latest
>> release in the 4.x series.
>>
>
>
> +1
>
>
>
>> * Move functional puppet4 jobs from experimental to check pipeline
>> (non-voting). They'll bring very useful feedback. It will add 6 more
>> jobs in the check queue, but since we will drop 2 unit tests jobs (in
>> both check & gate pipelines), it will add 2 jobs at total (in term of
>> time, unit tests jobs take 15 min and functional jobs take ~30 min) so
>> the impact of node consumption is IMHO not relevant here.
>>
>
>
> What's the plan for making Puppet4 jobs voting? I think this is a good
> start but we should more towards voting jobs I think.
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
--
Best Regards,
Egorenko Denis,
Senior Deployment Engineer
Mirantis
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160526/5737f8b6/attachment.html>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list