Cinder is definitely lacking reviewing force. I remember 2 years ago comparing with today and I can tell that patches are taking a lot longer to get reviewed. This link is also very useful to triage incoming patches: https://review.openstack.org/#/dashboard/?foreach=project:^openstack/.*cinder.* status:open NOT owner:self NOT label:Workflow<=-1 label:Verified>=1 NOT label:Code-Review<=-1,self NOT label:Code-Review>=1,self&title=Cinder Review Inbox&Cinder Specs=project:openstack/manila-specs&Bug Fixes=topic:^bug/.*&Needs Feedback (Changes older than 5 days that have not been reviewed by anyone)=NOT label:Code-Review<=2 age:5d&You are a reviewer, but haven't voted in the current revision=reviewer:self&Needs final +2=label:Code-Review>=2 limit:50&New Contributors=reviewer:10068&Passed Jenkins, No Negative Feedback=NOT label:Code-Review>=2 NOT label:Code-Review<=-1 limit:50&Wayward Changes (Changes with no code review in the last 2days)=NOT label:Code-Review<=2 age:2d Huge link but the result is beautiful :) Erlon On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Eric Harney <eharney at redhat.com> wrote: > And for completeness, I'd also like to mention that there is this nice > dashboard: > > http://status.openstack.org/reviews/#cinder > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160524/74cf02f3/attachment.html>