Open Stack

+1 for the bi-weekly proposal @17:00 UTC Tuesday.

IMO, let's start with this and then we can check on the feasibility of
having the meeting on a weekly basis.
On May 23, 2016 1:10 PM, "Takashi Yamamoto" <yamamoto at midokura.com> wrote:

> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo
> <majopela at redhat.com> wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> >    Finally we took over the channel for 1h. mostly because the time was
> > already agreed between many people on opposed timezones and it was a bit
> > late to cancel it.
> >
> >    The first point was finding a suitable timeslot for a biweekly meeting
> > -for some time- and alternatively following up on email. We should not
> take
> > over the neutron channel for these meetings anymore, I'm sorry for the
> > inconvenience.
>
> Tony pointed out that there are bi-weekly slot available.
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/316830/
> i guess the slot is fine for many of us.
>
> >
> >   Please find the summary here:
> >
> >
> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/network_common_flow_classifier/2016/network_common_flow_classifier.2016-05-17-17.02.html
> >
> > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 8:10 PM, Kevin Benton <kevin at benton.pub> wrote:
> >>
> >> Yeah, no meetings in #openstack-neutron please. It leaves us nowhere to
> >> discuss development stuff during that hour.
> >>
> >> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 2:54 AM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo
> >> <majopela at redhat.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I agree, let's try to find a timeslot that works.
> >>>
> >>> using #openstack-neutron with the meetbot works, but it's going to
> >>> generate a lot of noise.
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrachys at redhat.com
> >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> > On 16 May 2016, at 15:47, Takashi Yamamoto <yamamoto at midokura.com>
> >>>> > wrote:
> >>>> >
> >>>> > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 10:25 PM, Takashi Yamamoto
> >>>> > <yamamoto at midokura.com> wrote:
> >>>> >> hi,
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka
> >>>> >> <ihrachys at redhat.com> wrote:
> >>>> >>> +1 for earlier time. But also, have we booked any channel for the
> >>>> >>> meeting? Hijacking #openstack-neutron may not work fine during
> such a busy
> >>>> >>> (US) time. I suggest we propose a patch for
> >>>> >>> https://github.com/openstack-infra/irc-meetings
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> i agree and submitted a patch.
> >>>> >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/316830/
> >>>> >
> >>>> > oops, unfortunately there seems no meeting channel free at the time
> >>>> > slot.
> >>>>
> >>>> This should be solved either by changing the slot, or by getting a new
> >>>> channel registered for meetings. Using unregistered channels,
> especially
> >>>> during busy hours, is not effective, and is prone to overlaps for
> relevant
> >>>> meetings. The meetings will also not get a proper slot at
> >>>> eavesdrop.openstack.org.
> >>>>
> >>>> Ihar
> >>>>
> >>>>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> >>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> >>>> Unsubscribe:
> >>>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> >>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> >>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> >>> Unsubscribe:
> >>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> >> Unsubscribe:
> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> __________________________________________________________________________
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe:
> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160523/b77e0563/attachment.html>