[openstack-dev] [neutron] work on Common Flow Classifier and OVS Agent extension for Newton cycle

Kevin Benton kevin at benton.pub
Wed May 18 19:26:53 UTC 2016


No worries. If the slot isn't available maybe we can get infra to add
another channel.

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 12:57 AM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo <
majopela at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hey,
>
>    Finally we took over the channel for 1h. mostly because the time was
> already agreed between many people on opposed timezones and it was a bit
> late to cancel it.
>
>    The first point was finding a suitable timeslot for a biweekly meeting
> -for some time- and alternatively following up on email. We should not take
> over the neutron channel for these meetings anymore, I'm sorry for the
> inconvenience.
>
>   Please find the summary here:
>
>
> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/network_common_flow_classifier/2016/network_common_flow_classifier.2016-05-17-17.02.html
>
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 8:10 PM, Kevin Benton <kevin at benton.pub> wrote:
>
>> Yeah, no meetings in #openstack-neutron please. It leaves us nowhere to
>> discuss development stuff during that hour.
>>
>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 2:54 AM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo <
>> majopela at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I agree, let's try to find a timeslot that works.
>>>
>>> using #openstack-neutron with the meetbot works, but it's going to
>>> generate a lot of noise.
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrachys at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> > On 16 May 2016, at 15:47, Takashi Yamamoto <yamamoto at midokura.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 10:25 PM, Takashi Yamamoto
>>>> > <yamamoto at midokura.com> wrote:
>>>> >> hi,
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka <
>>>> ihrachys at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> >>> +1 for earlier time. But also, have we booked any channel for the
>>>> meeting? Hijacking #openstack-neutron may not work fine during such a busy
>>>> (US) time. I suggest we propose a patch for
>>>> https://github.com/openstack-infra/irc-meetings
>>>> >>
>>>> >> i agree and submitted a patch.
>>>> >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/316830/
>>>> >
>>>> > oops, unfortunately there seems no meeting channel free at the time
>>>> slot.
>>>>
>>>> This should be solved either by changing the slot, or by getting a new
>>>> channel registered for meetings. Using unregistered channels, especially
>>>> during busy hours, is not effective, and is prone to overlaps for relevant
>>>> meetings. The meetings will also not get a proper slot at
>>>> eavesdrop.openstack.org.
>>>>
>>>> Ihar
>>>>
>>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>> Unsubscribe:
>>>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe:
>>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160518/db2744ff/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list