[openstack-dev] [release] Re: [Neutron][L2GW] Mitaka release of L2 Gateway now available
Ihar Hrachyshka
ihrachys at redhat.com
Tue May 17 12:39:40 UTC 2016
> On 17 May 2016, at 14:27, Doug Hellmann <doug at doughellmann.com> wrote:
>
> Excerpts from Ihar Hrachyshka's message of 2016-05-17 12:25:55 +0200:
>>
>>> On 16 May 2016, at 21:16, Armando M. <armamig at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 16 May 2016 at 05:15, Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrachys at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 11 May 2016, at 22:05, Sukhdev Kapur <sukhdevkapur at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Folks,
>>>>
>>>> I am happy to announce that Mitaka release for L2 Gateway is released and now available at https://pypi.python.org/pypi/networking-l2gw.
>>>>
>>>> You can install it by using "pip install networking-l2gw"
>>>>
>>>> This release has several enhancements and fixes for issues discovered in liberty release.
>>>
>>> How do you release it? I think the way to release new deliverables as of Newton dev cycle is thru openstack/releases repository, as documented in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/308984/
>>>
>>> Have you pushed git tag manually?
>>>
>>> I can only see the stable branch, tags can only be pushed by the neutron-release team.
>>
>> 2016.1.0 tag is in the repo, and is part of stable/mitaka branch.
>>
>> Git tag history suggests that Carl pushed it (manually I guess?) It seems that we release some independent deliverables thru openstack/releases, and some manually pushing tags into repos.
>>
>> I would love if we can consolidate all our releases to use a single automation mechanism (openstack/releases patches), independent of release model. For that, I would like to hear from release folks whether we are allowed to use openstack/releases repo for release:independent deliverables that are part of an official project (neutron).
>
> We're working on it. This cycle we've expanded coverage of the releases
> repo to all official projects using cycle-based models.
>
>>
>> [Note that it would not mean we move the oversight burden for those deliverables onto release team; neutron-release folks would still need to approve them; it’s only about technicalities, not governance]
>>
>> The existence of the following git directory suggests that it’s supported:
>>
>> https://github.com/openstack/releases/tree/master/deliverables/_independent
>>
>> We already have some networking-* subprojects there, like networking-bgpvpn or networking-odl. I would love to see all new releases tracked there.
>
> Any official projects following the independent model may use the
> openstack/releases repository to record their releases after they
> are tagged.
You mean we should follow the steps:
- first, push git tag manually;
- then, propose openstack/releases patch describing the new tag?
If that’s the case, it was not exactly followed for some late neutron stadium releases, like: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/308962/
Actually, that later one created the tag in the repo for us. So what’s the reason to take the first step manually?
Ihar
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list