Open Stack

Why is that?

Thank you,
Mark

On 5/13/2016 7:21 PM, Dieterly, Deklan wrote:
> If we allow Go, then we should also consider allowing JVM based languages.
> -- Deklan Dieterly Senior Systems Software Engineer HPE On 5/13/16, 
> 2:10 PM, "Adam Young" <ayoung at redhat.com> wrote:
>> >Can we just up and support Go, please?  I'm a C++ and C buff, but I
>> >would not inflict either of those on other people, nor would I want to
>> >support their code. Go is designed to be native but readable/writable.
>> >
>> >
>> >There is nothing perfect in this world.
>> >
>> >Python for most things.
>> >Javascript for web out of necessity
>> >Go for native tuning.
>> >
>> >Yes, Flapper, I like Rust, too, but we have to pick something, and I am
>> >not the one trying to code this.
>> >
>> >It makes sense. Go is already packaged for Fedora and Debian.  We can
>> >deal with it.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >__________________________________________________________________________
>> >OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> >Unsubscribe:OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe:OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160514/d18aa181/attachment.html>