[openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [glance] glance-registry deprecation: Request for feedback

Flavio Percoco flavio at redhat.com
Fri May 13 19:29:52 UTC 2016


On 12/05/16 20:06 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
>The copy-from case is only in v1.
>
>
>For v2, I am having discussion with Doug, Morgan and Mike (TC) members
>as well as Chris (interop engineer with foundation) to ensure that we
>can actually support copy-from in v2 for end users. I will add you to
>the review and you can chime in.

First time I hear about these discussions. Where is it happening. What's the
thing under discussion at this point?

Flavio

>
>Thanks.
>
>
>On 5/12/16 7:59 PM, Fox, Kevin M wrote:
>> Is there a copy-from-url method that's not deprecated yet?
>>
>> The app catalog is still pointing users at the command line in v1 mode....
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Kevin
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *From:* Matt Fischer [matt at mattfischer.com]
>> *Sent:* Thursday, May 12, 2016 4:43 PM
>> *To:* Flavio Percoco
>> *Cc:* openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org;
>> openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>> *Subject:* Re: [Openstack-operators] [glance] glance-registry
>> deprecation: Request for feedback
>>
>>
>> On May 11, 2016 10:03 PM, "Flavio Percoco" <flavio at redhat.com
>> <mailto:flavio at redhat.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Greetings,
>> >
>> > The Glance team is evaluating the needs and usefulness of the Glance
>> Registry
>> > service and this email is a request for feedback from the overall
>> community
>> > before the team moves forward with anything.
>> >
>> > Historically, there have been reasons to create this service. Some
>> deployments
>> > use it to hide database credentials from Glance public endpoints,
>> others use it
>> > for scaling purposes and others because v1 depends on it. This is a
>> good time
>> > for the team to re-evaluate the need of these services since v2
>> doesn't depend
>> > on it.
>> >
>> > So, here's the big question:
>> >
>> > Why do you think this service should be kept around?
>>
>> I've not seen any responses so far so wanted to just say we have no
>> use case for it. I assume this also explains the silence from the rest
>> of the ops. +1 to remove.
>>
>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>-- 
>
>Thanks,
>Nikhil
>
>
>__________________________________________________________________________
>OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

-- 
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160513/0050d947/attachment.pgp>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list