[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] LBaaSv2 / Octavia support

Xav Paice xavpaice at gmail.com
Fri May 13 04:42:10 UTC 2016

Thanks for explaining that - I thought I was going mad.  You're right about
implementation challenges!

TBH, I'm writing something that would work at least in our environment and
trying to keep it as small and simple as possible so we can maintain it -
currently one of our dev team is adding a feature or two to make Octavia
match our business requirements, and I'm working on the deployment.
Openstack-ansible is quite a new approach for our deployment (we've done
most things via puppet till now) - what I was really after is some examples
to scab from, but if I manage to beat you to it, it might wind up the other
way round.  The Puppet deployment has been really good till recently but
like many, we're now unable to do 'big bang' upgrades and the lack of
orchestration in Puppet is a real limitation.

I'm happy to be involved with the implementation, but until we're using
openstack-ansible for our deployments my ability to test/run things would
be quite limited.

Maybe this is the push I need to knuckle down and migrate.

On 12 May 2016 at 00:33, Major Hayden <major at mhtx.net> wrote:

> Hash: SHA256
> On 05/10/2016 11:58 PM, Xav Paice wrote:
> > Sorry to dig up an ancient thread.
> >
> > I see the spec has been implemented, and in the os_neutron repo I see
> configs for the Haproxy driver for LOADBALANCERV2 - but not Octavia.  Am I
> missing something here?
> Hello Xav,
> No need to apologize -- I should have sent an update sooner. :)
> After a thorough review, we decided to go forth with LBaaSv2 via the agent
> since we needed something to quickly replace the now deprecated LBaaSv1
> API.  Octavia is still on the roadmap, but there are some implementation
> challenges that need more attention.
> I'm working to get more involved in some of the Octavia meetings and
> discussions so I can share the use cases of various OpenStack-Ansible
> operators.  Did you have some interest in helping with the implementation
> or are you eager to consume it once it's available?
> - --
> Major Hayden
> Version: GnuPG v2
> H0L1suY6R+oGjDT+xuxox2uDcAADIWbHxBKosV/1jQHJRPoWfKhBhke4W2/MOsTV
> miqBrCKILLzJxdcXHrG54QHPb0FBqSLcmJIaFfysW1Rw3rH2btCSw8zoWNXipy39
> tYkDxh1z216gCIqNFSXSnpMgEj5D1LzAOZ1igBBOsYJYAwCvJp9XNcqAvN7FUg4C
> cvzSDztrb/r/CYtqqRYweD7vc70o/dz2Ej1wQn7ris0TrQHUiKU977NUMAiQmu+l
> 0YR/5FHV1VFMvZJGHv9J0gLWfq6sHhbqOOSLNuxtO9L99L25Knq72kOviipsYHWK
> IfIcP/s2KFIvX9mOrvMejXk2GKDSIb/vZ1LWTrS4Kg9i8rjVEroyHdO8/AHTpUK4
> bGbMcp3cqtTh1LHKu4NQh14SOvVwcR6hHVkRfcxO8l+YGghpexURjIOCGYGC+PI/
> Gk1t8bkW32x7+rZJHoiW/jBoWNR8l0ugFmS6VliJy9gufKEekCYZpIESPrnsHXjI
> 1NSOBv4QtpXXd+FJFNO2r9pRAzkj+CKrKQ9EJIr0wYbdiGEwic+CWOZwEw+Jsc5a
> DoQmS6iCVIZx5dxoO3Bes0F8k4Ov1mj2ZyYEN2JKArzArrDF/4NSDeSCNxYMGeRB
> 9NGm0sY4uHu6ZelxlFyS
> =sCy8
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160513/71e7581b/attachment.html>

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list