Open Stack

On 2016-05-12 15:39, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2016-05-12 07:33:35 -0600 (-0600), Matt Kassawara wrote:
> [...]
>> I'm also not a fan of option 3 because it trades one kind of technical debt
>> for another. However, one could argue that some (relevant) content is
>> better than no (or defunct) content. Interestingly, option 3 also reflects
>> what ultimately happens if projects decide to maintain all documentation in
>> their respective repositories. Easier for developers to contribute, but at
>> the expense of usability by our various audiences.
> 
> While not a frequent reviewer of changes to Docs team repos, I tend
> to agree that option 3 is just shuffling around (or even increasing)
> the overall pain.
> 
> For option 2 keep in mind that our current version of Gerrit allows
> you to make edits from its Web UI in your browser, so it may be
> almost as easy to correct trivial issues while you're reviewing
> instead of commenting on them.
> 

And that's what I'm sometimes doing if it's just some minor issues.
Edit, publish, summarize my changes - and then +2 ;). That's a really
nice thing of our WebUI,

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi
  SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
   GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton,
       HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
    GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126