Open Stack

I'm trying Kuryr with networking-calico and think I've hit an unhelpful
inconsistency.  A Neutron port has 'id' and 'device_id' fields that are
usually different.  When Nova does VIF binding for a Neutron port, it
generates the Linux device name from 'tap' + port['id'].  But when Kuryr
does VIF binding for a Neutron port, I think it generates the Linux
device name from 'tap' + port['device_id'].

Thoughts?  Does that sound right, or have I misread the code and my
logs?  If it's correct, it marginally impacts the ability to use
identical agent and Neutron driver/plugin code for the two cases (Nova
and Kuryr).

Thanks,
    Neil