Ben Swartzlander wrote: > On 05/05/2016 04:01 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: >> Ben, >> >> Have you seen this yet? >> >> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/legal-discuss/2014-March/000201.html >> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Foundation/15Oct2012BoardMinutes#Approval_of_the_CCBY_License_for_Documentation. >> > > No I hadn't seen this. It's helpful to know that there is official > support from the board for using the CCBY license but it's unclear what > that's supposed to look like, since I can't find a single project that's > converted their whole specs repo to the new license. > > My confusion comes from how to handle the existing Apache 2.0 stuff in > the cookie cutter. I can't just drop the Apache 2.0 license... The only > obvious path forward is to create a gross mess like the existing specs > repos have where there's a mix of the 2 licenses and it's not clear > which license applies to what. Looks like a question/discussion for the legal-discuss ML. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx)