[openstack-dev] [tricircle] About the dynamic pod binding

Yipei Niu newypei at gmail.com
Fri May 6 03:05:32 UTC 2016


Got it with thanks.

Best regards,
Yipei

On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 9:48 AM, joehuang <joehuang at huawei.com> wrote:

> Hi, Yipei,
>
> Shinobu is correct, this should be taken into consideration in the design
> of dynamic pod binding.
>
> How to schedule pod, you can refer to host-aggregate scheduling with
> flavor, the difference is that the scheduling granularity is on pod level.
> By the tag in flavor extra-spec and volume type extrac_spec , tricircle can
> be aware of which type of resource the tenant wants to provision.
>
> For example:
> https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux_OpenStack_Platform/4/html/Configuration_Reference_Guide/host-aggregates.html
>
> So in
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/18kZZ1snMOCD9IQvUKI5NVDzSASpw-QKj7l2zNqMEd3g/edit,
> one field called resource_affinity_tag is proposed to be added into the pod
> table, it could be used for scheduling purpose. But this is only one
> proposal, you may have better idea to do that, after the spec is reviewed
> and approved, the doc can be update to reflect the new idea.
>
> Best Regards
> Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang )
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shinobu Kinjo [mailto:shinobu.kj at gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 8:06 AM
> To: Yipei Niu
> Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions);
> joehuang; Zhiyuan Cai; 金城 忍
> Subject: Re: [tricircle] About the dynamic pod binding
>
> Hi Yipei,
>
> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 9:54 PM, Yipei Niu <newypei at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi, all,
> >
> > For dynamic pod binding, I have some questions.
> >
> [snip]
> > 3. How is Tricircle aware of what type of resource wanted by tenants?
> > For example, a tenant wants to boot VMs for CAD modelling with
> > corresponding flavor. But in current code, the flavorRef is not get
> > involved in function get_pod_by_az_tenant, when querying pod bindings.
> > So do we need to modify the pod binding table to add such a column?
>
> Working through code bases, probably you are talking about future
> implementation, I guess.
>
> Cheers,
> Shinobu
>
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Yipei
>
>
>
> --
> Email:
> shinobu at linux.com
> shinobu at redhat.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160506/a6daa50d/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list