It appears that many of the existing specs repos contain a confusing mixture of Apache 2.0 licensed code and Creative Commons licensed docs. The official cookie-cutter for creating new specs repos [1] appears to also contain a mixture of the two licenses, although it's even more confusing because it seems an attempt was made to change the license from Apache to Creative Commons [2] yet there are still several [3] places [4] where Apache is clearly specified. I personally have no opinion on what license should be used, but I'd like to clearly specify the license for the newly-created manila-specs repo, and I'm happy with whatever the TC is currently recommending. -Ben Swartzlander [1] https://github.com/openstack-dev/specs-cookiecutter [2] https://github.com/openstack-dev/specs-cookiecutter/commit/8738f58981da3ad9c0f27fb545d61747213482a4#diff-053c5863d526dd5103cd9b0069074596 [3] https://github.com/openstack-dev/specs-cookiecutter/blob/master/%7B%7Bcookiecutter.repo_name%7D%7D/setup.cfg#L12 [4] https://github.com/openstack-dev/specs-cookiecutter/blob/master/README.rst