Open Stack

+1 to discarding shotgun. Should we register a BP for that?

> 30 бер. 2016 р. о 12:03 Igor Kalnitsky <ikalnitsky at mirantis.com> написав(ла):
> 
> Hey Fuelers,
> 
> I know that you probably wouldn't like to hear that, but in my opinion
> Fuel has to stop using Shotgun. It's nothing more but a command runner
> over SSH. Besides, it has well known issues such as retrieving remote
> directories with broken symlinks inside.
> 
> So I propose to find a modern alternative and reuse it. If we stop
> supporting Shotgun, we can spend extra time to focus on more important
> things.
> 
> As an example, we can consider to use Ansible. It should not be tricky
> to generate Ansible playbook instead of generating Shotgun one.
> Ansible is a  well known tool for devops and cloud operators, and they
> we will only benefit if we provide possibility to extend diagnostic
> recipes in usual (for them) way. What do you think?
> 
> Thanks,
> - Igor
> 
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 7:52 PM, Roman Prykhodchenko <me at romcheg.me> wrote:
>> Please, propose your options here then:
>> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/shotgun-rename
>> 
>> 29 бер. 2016 р. о 18:15 Jay Pipes <jaypipes at gmail.com> написав(ла):
>> 
>> On 03/29/2016 08:41 AM, Roman Prykhodchenko wrote:
>> 
>> Should we propose options and then arrange a poll?
>> 
>> 
>> Yup, ++ :)
>> 
>> 29 бер. 2016 р. о 16:40 Neil Jerram <Neil.Jerram at metaswitch.com>
>> написав(ла):
>> 
>> On 29/03/16 15:17, Jay Pipes wrote:
>> 
>> Hi!
>> 
>> Once Shotgun is pulled out of Fuel, may I suggest renaming it to
>> something different? I know in the past that Anita and a few others
>> thought the name was not something we should really be encouraging in
>> the OpenStack ecosystem.
>> 
>> Just something to consider since it's being decoupled anyway and may be
>> a good opportunity to rename at that point...
>> 
>> Best,
>> -jay
>> 
>> 
>> +1
>> 
>> Neil
>> 
>> 
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> 
>> 
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> 
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160330/f9d4995c/attachment.pgp>