[openstack-dev] Nominating Vikram Hosakot for Core Reviewer

Kwasniewska, Alicja alicja.kwasniewska at intel.com
Wed Mar 30 09:08:52 UTC 2016


+1

-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Hallisey [mailto:rhallise at redhat.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2016 6:40 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote] Nominating Vikram Hosakot for Core Reviewer

+1

----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Bourke" <paul.bourke at oracle.com>
To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2016 12:10:38 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote] Nominating Vikram Hosakot for Core Reviewer

+1

On 29/03/16 17:07, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> Consider this proposal a +1 in favor of Vikram joining the core 
> reviewer team.  His reviews are outstanding.  If he doesn’t have 
> anything useful to add to a review, he doesn't pile on the review with 
> more –1s which are slightly disheartening to people.  Vikram has 
> started a trend amongst the core reviewers of actually diagnosing gate 
> failures in peoples patches as opposed to saying gate failed please 
> fix.  He does this diagnosis in nearly every review I see, and if he 
> is stumped  he says so.  His 30 days review stats place him in pole 
> position and his 90 day review stats place him in second position.  Of 
> critical notice is that Vikram is ever-present on IRC which in my 
> professional experience is the #1 indicator of how well a core reviewer will perform long term.
>    Besides IRC and review requirements, we also have code requirements 
> for core reviewers.  Vikram has implemented only 10 patches so far, 
> butI feel he could amp this up if he had feature work to do.  At the 
> moment we are in a holding pattern on master development because we 
> need to fix Mitaka bugs.  That said Vikram is actively working on 
> diagnosing root causes of people's bugs in the IRC channel pretty much 
> 12-18 hours a day so we can ship Mitaka in a working bug-free state.
>
> Our core team consists of 11 people.  Vikram requires at minimum 6 +1 
> votes, with no veto –2 votes within a 7 day voting window to end on 
> April 7th.  If there is a veto vote prior to April 7th I will close 
> voting.  If there is a unanimous vote prior to April 7th, I will make 
> appropriate changes in gerrit.
>
> Regards
> -steve
>
> [1] http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/kolla-group/30
> [2] http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/kolla-group/90
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> ____ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: 
> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list