[openstack-dev] [kolla][vote] Nominating Vikram Hosakot for Core Reviewer

MD. Nadeem md.nadeem at nectechnologies.in
Wed Mar 30 04:11:03 UTC 2016


+1 
No doubt he is good at review and also helpful to guide newbies joining kolla.

-----Original Message-----
From: Swapnil Kulkarni [mailto:me at coolsvap.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 9:14 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote] Nominating Vikram Hosakot for Core Reviewer

On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 9:37 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) <stdake at cisco.com> wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> Consider this proposal a +1 in favor of Vikram joining the core 
> reviewer team.  His reviews are outstanding.  If he doesn’t have 
> anything useful to add to a review, he doesn't pile on the review with 
> more –1s which are slightly disheartening to people.  Vikram has 
> started a trend amongst the core reviewers of actually diagnosing gate 
> failures in peoples patches as opposed to saying gate failed please 
> fix.  He does this diagnosis in nearly every review I see, and if he 
> is stumped  he says so.  His 30 days review stats place him in pole 
> position and his 90 day review stats place him in second position.  Of 
> critical notice is that Vikram is ever-present on IRC which in my professional experience is the #1 indicator of how well a core
> reviewer will perform long term.   Besides IRC and review requirements, we
> also have code requirements for core reviewers.  Vikram has 
> implemented only
> 10 patches so far, butI feel he could amp this up if he had feature 
> work to do.  At the moment we are in a holding pattern on master 
> development because we need to fix Mitaka bugs.  That said Vikram is 
> actively working on diagnosing root causes of people's bugs in the IRC 
> channel pretty much 12-18 hours a day so we can ship Mitaka in a working bug-free state.
>
> Our core team consists of 11 people.  Vikram requires at minimum 6 +1 
> votes, with no veto –2 votes within a 7 day voting window to end on 
> April 7th.  If there is a veto vote prior to April 7th I will close 
> voting.  If there is a unanimous vote prior to April 7th, I will make 
> appropriate changes in gerrit.
>
> Regards
> -steve
>
> [1] http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/kolla-group/30
> [2] http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/kolla-group/90
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> ____ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: 
> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>

Big +1.

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



DISCLAIMER:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and
intended
for the named recipient(s) only. 
It shall not attach any liability on the originator or NEC or its
affiliates. Any views or opinions presented in 
this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the
opinions of NEC or its affiliates. 
Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification,
distribution and / or publication of 
this message without the prior written consent of the author of this e-mail is
strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender
immediately. .
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list