Open Stack

+1

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 6:45 AM Michał Jastrzębski <inc007 at gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> On 29 March 2016 at 11:39, Ryan Hallisey <rhallise at redhat.com> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Paul Bourke" <paul.bourke at oracle.com>
> > To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2016 12:10:38 PM
> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote] Nominating Vikram Hosakot for
> Core Reviewer
> >
> > +1
> >
> > On 29/03/16 17:07, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
> >> Hey folks,
> >>
> >> Consider this proposal a +1 in favor of Vikram joining the core reviewer
> >> team.  His reviews are outstanding.  If he doesn’t have anything useful
> >> to add to a review, he doesn't pile on the review with more –1s which
> >> are slightly disheartening to people.  Vikram has started a trend
> >> amongst the core reviewers of actually diagnosing gate failures in
> >> peoples patches as opposed to saying gate failed please fix.  He does
> >> this diagnosis in nearly every review I see, and if he is stumped  he
> >> says so.  His 30 days review stats place him in pole position and his 90
> >> day review stats place him in second position.  Of critical notice is
> >> that Vikram is ever-present on IRC which in my professional experience
> >> is the #1 indicator of how well a core reviewer will perform long term.
> >>    Besides IRC and review requirements, we also have code requirements
> >> for core reviewers.  Vikram has implemented only 10 patches so far, butI
> >> feel he could amp this up if he had feature work to do.  At the moment
> >> we are in a holding pattern on master development because we need to fix
> >> Mitaka bugs.  That said Vikram is actively working on diagnosing root
> >> causes of people's bugs in the IRC channel pretty much 12-18 hours a day
> >> so we can ship Mitaka in a working bug-free state.
> >>
> >> Our core team consists of 11 people.  Vikram requires at minimum 6 +1
> >> votes, with no veto –2 votes within a 7 day voting window to end on
> >> April 7th.  If there is a veto vote prior to April 7th I will close
> >> voting.  If there is a unanimous vote prior to April 7th, I will make
> >> appropriate changes in gerrit.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> -steve
> >>
> >> [1] http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/kolla-group/30
> >> [2] http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/kolla-group/90
> >>
> >>
> >>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> >> Unsubscribe:
> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >>
> >
> >
> __________________________________________________________________________
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe:
> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
> >
> __________________________________________________________________________
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe:
> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160330/e2b8e748/attachment.html>