Open Stack

On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:04 PM, Salvatore Orlando
<salv.orlando at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11 March 2016 at 23:15, Carl Baldwin <carl at ecbaldwin.net> wrote:
> I wonder if we could satisfy this requirement with tags - as it seems these
> subnets are anyway operator-owned you should probably not worry about
> regular tenants fiddling with them, and therefore the "helper" subnet needed
> for the fip namespace could just be tagged to the purpose.

We discussed tags at the mid-cycle.  We decided against using them.
One reason is that tags are pretty new and are a moving target.
Another reason I was hesitant is that tags were designed to be user
facing.  As I recall, we didn't want the tags to affect code behavior.
But, maybe I misunderstood that.  We want service types to affect
IPAM, at least.

Brian Haley is going to put up a spec for this service type attribute
work.  Brian, would you mind posting a link to your spec review when
you've posted it?

Carl