Open Stack

+1

On 25/03/16 15:36, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> These branches are essentially unmaintained and we have completely given
> up on them.  That’s ok – they were paths of our development.  I didn't
> really want to branch them in the first place, but the community
> demanded it, so I delivered that :)
>
> Now that our architecture is fairly stable in liberty and mitaka, I
> think it makes sense to do the following
> 1.. tag each of the above branches with icehosue-eol, juno-eol, kilo-eol
> 2. Ask infrastructure to remove the branches from git
>
> This is possible; I have just verified in openstack-infra.  I'd like a
> vote from the core review team.  If you would like to see the kilo
> branch stay, please note that, and if there is a majority on
> icehosue/juno but not kilo I'll make the appropriate arrangements with
> openstack-infra.
>
> I will leave voting open for 1 week until Saturday April 2nd.  I will
> close voting early if there is a majority vote.
>
> Regards
> -steve
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>