[openstack-dev] [docs] Our Install Guides Only Cover Defcore - What about big tent?
Steve Gordon
sgordon at redhat.com
Wed Mar 23 16:08:48 UTC 2016
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve Gordon" <sgordon at redhat.com>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Graham Hayes" hayes at hpe.com>
> > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> > <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> >
> > On 23/03/2016 15:37, Steve Gordon wrote:
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > >> From: "Mike Perez" <thingee at gmail.com>
> > >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List"
> > >> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> > >>
> > >> Hey all,
> > >>
> > >> I've been talking to a variety of projects about lack of install guides.
> > >> This
> > >> came from me not having a great experience with trying out projects in
> > >> the
> > >> big
> > >> tent.
> > >>
> > >> Projects like Manila have proposed install docs [1], but they were
> > >> rejected
> > >> by the install docs team because it's not in defcore. One of Manila's
> > >> goals
> > >> of
> > >> getting these docs accepted is to apply for the operators tag
> > >> ops:docs:install-guide [2] so that it helps their maturity level in the
> > >> project
> > >> navigator [3].
> > >>
> > >> Adrian Otto expressed to me having the same issue for Magnum. I think
> > >> it's
> > >> funny that a project that gets keynote time at the OpenStack conference
> > >> can't
> > >> be in the install docs personally.
> > >
> > > Just two minor clarifications here:
> > >
> > > * Manila install docs are actively being worked on for inclusion in the
> > > Mitaka version of the guide:
> > > http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/openstack-manuals/tree/doc/install-guide/source/manila.rst
> > >
> > > * Magnum install docs were only very recently proposed here -
> > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/288580/ - nobody is saying they can't be
> > > in the install guide assuming someone is willing to write/maintain them,
> > > but until now it wasn't clear anyone was.
> > >
> > > I certainly think a better system for linking out-of-tree install docs
> > > for
> > > big tent projects would be worth pursuing, but regardless of where it
> > > lives someone still has to write/maintain that user-orientated content.
> > > For those that have someone actively doing this on an ongoing basis they
> > > already have a path to inclusion in the guide (or at least, it seems that
> > > way based on the cases I am familiar with like those above).
> > >
> > > Are there examples of projects that have this user orientated install
> > > documentation written but are actively being rejected from including it
> > > in
> > > the install guide (in the Magnum case it has been pushed out to Newton as
> > > it was a late submission, not rejected permanently)?
> > >
> >
> > the linked review - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/213756/
>
> Did you look at the link I provided above?:
>
> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/openstack-manuals/tree/doc/install-guide/source/manila.rst
>
> This content is merged.
>
> -Steve
Here is the Mitaka spec review for the proposal to add Magnum to the guide: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/275200/
Here is the Mitaka review to add the Magnum content to the guide: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/273724/
-Steve
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list