Open Stack

On 21 March 2016 at 04:32, Sean M. Collins <sean at coreitpro.com> wrote:

> Rossella Sblendido wrote:
> > 2) multi-node jobs run for every patch set. Is that really what we want?
> > They take pretty long. We could move them to a periodic job.
>
> I would rather remove all the single-node jobs. Nova has been moving to
> multinode jobs for their gate (if I recall correctly my
> conversation with Dan Smith) and we should be moving in this direction
> too. We should test Neutron the way it is deployed in production.
>
>
This was not true last time I checked. Switching to multinode jobs for the
gate means that all projects in the integrated gate will have to use the
miltinode configuration.


> Also, who is really monitoring the periodic jobs? Truthfully? I know
> there are some IPv6 jobs that are periodic and I'll be the first to
> admit that I am not following them *at all*.
>
> So, my thinking is, unless it's running at the gate and inflicting pain
> on people, it's not going to be a treated as a priority. Look at Linux
> Bridge - serious race conditions that existed for years only
> got fixed once I inflicted pain on all the Neutron devs by making it
> voting and running on every patchset (sorry, not sorry).
>
> --
> Sean M. Collins
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160321/6177190b/attachment.html>