Open Stack

Guys,

Fuel has own implementation of pacemaker [1]. It's functionality may be
useful in other projects.

[1] https://github.com/fuel-infra/puppet-pacemaker

--
Best regards,
Sergii Golovatiuk,
Skype #golserge
IRC #holser

On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 6:20 AM, Emilien Macchi <emilien.macchi at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> On Feb 12, 2016 11:06 PM, "Spencer Krum" <nibz at spencerkrum.com> wrote:
> >
> > The module would also be welcome under the voxpupuli[0] namespace on
> > github. We currently have a puppet-corosync[1] module, and there is some
> > overlap there, but a pure pacemaker module would be a welcome addition.
> >
> > I'm not sure which I would prefer, just that VP is an option. For
> > greater openstack integration, gerrit is the way to go. For greater
> > participation from the wider puppet community, github is the way to go.
> > Voxpupuli provides testing and releasing infrastructure.
>
> The thing is, we might want to gate it on tripleo since it's the first
> consumer right now. Though I agree VP would be a good place too, to attract
> more puppet users.
>
> Dilemma!
> Maybe we could start using VP, with good testing and see how it works.
>
> Iterate later if needed. Thoughts?
>
> >
> > [0] https://voxpupuli.org/
> > [1] https://github.com/voxpupuli/puppet-corosync
> >
> > --
> >   Spencer Krum
> >   nibz at spencerkrum.com
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016, at 09:44 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> > > Please look and vote:
> > > https://review.openstack.org/279698
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks for your feedback!
> > >
> > > On 02/10/2016 04:04 AM, Juan Antonio Osorio wrote:
> > > > I like the idea of moving it to use the OpenStack infrastructure.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Ben Nemec <openstack at nemebean.com
> > > > <mailto:openstack at nemebean.com>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >     On 02/09/2016 08:05 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> > > >     > Hi,
> > > >     >
> > > >     > TripleO is currently using puppet-pacemaker [1] which is a
> module
> > > >     hosted
> > > >     > & managed by Github.
> > > >     > The module was created and mainly maintained by Redhat. It
> tends to
> > > >     > break TripleO quite often since we don't have any gate.
> > > >     >
> > > >     > I propose to move the module to OpenStack so we'll use
> OpenStack Infra
> > > >     > benefits (Gerrit, Releases, Gating, etc). Another idea would
> be to
> > > >     gate
> > > >     > the module with TripleO HA jobs.
> > > >     >
> > > >     > The question is, under which umbrella put the module? Puppet ?
> > > >     TripleO ?
> > > >     >
> > > >     > Or no umbrella, like puppet-ceph. <-- I like this idea
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I think the module not being under an umbrella makes sense.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >     >
> > > >     > Any feedback is welcome,
> > > >     >
> > > >     > [1] https://github.com/redhat-openstack/puppet-pacemaker
> > > >
> > > >     Seems like a module that would be useful outside of TripleO, so
> it
> > > >     doesn't seem like it should live under that.  Other than that I
> don't
> > > >     have enough knowledge of the organization of the puppet modules
> to
> > > >     comment.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
>  __________________________________________________________________________
> > > >     OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > > >     Unsubscribe:
> > > >     OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > > >     <
> http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
> > > >
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Juan Antonio Osorio R.
> > > > e-mail: jaosorior at gmail.com <mailto:jaosorior at gmail.com>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> __________________________________________________________________________
> > > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > > > Unsubscribe:
> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Emilien Macchi
> > >
> > >
> __________________________________________________________________________
> > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > > Unsubscribe:
> > > OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> > > Email had 1 attachment:
> > > + signature.asc
> > >   1k (application/pgp-signature)
> >
> >
> __________________________________________________________________________
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe:
> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160317/ce659c1a/attachment.html>