Open Stack

Main reason to split negative tests out, that I see, is attempt to remove
"corner, not integrational" tests out of Tempest tree. If so, then
"negative" tests is not proper choice, I think.
Tempest has lots of positive "corner" test cases. So, if move something,
then we need to move exactly "corner" tests and leave only "integrational"
tests of any kind - either it is negative or positive.
It is said, that doing so, all single-project related tests will be in its
own repo as a plugin and only integrational tests will be in Tempest.

Valeriy

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 7:31 AM, Qiming Teng <tengqim at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
wrote:

> >
> > I'd love to see this idea explored further. What happens if Tempest
> > ends up without tests, as a library for shared code as well as a
> > centralized place to run tests from via plugins?
> >
>
> Also curious about this. It seems weird to separate the 'positive' and
> the 'negative' ones, assuming those patches are mostly contributed by
> the same group of developers.
>
> Qiming
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



-- 
Kind Regards
Valeriy Ponomaryov
www.mirantis.com
vponomaryov at mirantis.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160317/c9b1162d/attachment.html>